Wednesday, January 29, 2014

My Letter to the Jakarta Post

Source:
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/01/30/your-letters-govt-has-stick-with-mining-law.html

Your Letter: Govt has to stick with mining law

The Jakarta Post | Readers Forum | Thu, January 30 2014, 9:59 AM
This refers to “Miners oppose duties, plan legal fights,” (The Jakarta Post, Jan. 24, p1).

I do hope that the Indonesian government will stick to the stipulations as outlined in the mining law and will dare to challenge these two multinational mining companies (Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. along with Newmont Mining Corp) on their threats of suing the government of Indonesia at the international arbitration body. 

Enough time for preparation had been given for them to construct their domestic processing factories prior to the mining law fully coming into force, but they just missed this golden opportunity by trying to play under-the-table negotiations with related government officers, hoping that this mining law would be amended or postponed in accordance with their self-interest. Thank God that the government officials keep their integrity and nationalism.

I reckon these multinational mining companies have been enjoying lucrative profits from their mining operations in Indonesia for many decades and they still want to keep this privilege, up until the natural resources are completely gone. 
Despite the huge profits that those multinational companies have gained from their operations so far, they have contributed insignificantly to the welfare of local communities in their respective operation sites. 

The community development and/or corporate social responsibility activities that have been carried out on the ground so far are merely lip service rather than genuine corporate strategic actions to improve the welfare of the locals. 

As a case in point, a multinational gold mining company has been operating for more than two decades in Murung Raya district, Central Kalimantan province. 
Millions of tons of gold and silver have been produced and sold by this company and million or billion dollar profits have been generated from its operations. But, what has happened to the socio-economic conditions of the few villages surrounding this company? Nothing much has changed, compared to the previous decades before this multinational mining firm started its operations in this location.

Thus, I encourage the government not to make even a single backward step. There is the right momentum for Indonesia now to reap the economic and social benefits from mining resources in this country for the sake of its people’s welfare and dignity. 
Huge profits from mining activities in Indonesia need to be shared equally and justly among the country’s stakeholders, not just to benefit people in northern countries.

Alue Dohong
Central Kalimantan

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Deforestation debates: A little progress is in progress

by Silvia Irawan, Alue Dohong and Guntur Prabowo

Published at the Jakarta Post | Opinion | Wed, January 15 2014, 11:48 AM

A recent global analysis of forest loss published in Science magazine found that deforestation in Indonesia had doubled between the 2000-2003 period and the 2011-2012 period. 
This study contradicted official Indonesian data released by the Forestry Ministry, which said that the rate of deforestation had been cut in half during the same period. 

An article published in The Jakarta Post on Nov. 19, 2013 entitled “Google maps should be used to challenge official” accused the Forestry Ministry of not being transparent about its methods used to calculate deforestation. 
This article failed to report on the progress that the Forestry Ministry has achieved in making information on deforestation available to the public and sharing its methodology.

For the past three years, deforestation has received considerable national press coverage in Indonesia. According to Forestry Ministry data, the year 2013 began with encouraging news about the deforestation rate in Indonesia, which declined from over 1 million hectares per year between 2000 and 2003 to around 0.45 million hectares between 2011 and 2012. 

In early November, a paper published by Hansen et al. (2013) in Science included a global deforestation map. The paper stated that deforestation in Indonesia had doubled from around 1 million hectares per year between 2000 and 2003 to around 2 million hectares per year between 2011 and 2012. 

The methodology applied by the Forestry Ministry is available to the public. One can find it in most publications or statistic books published by the ministry. 

It conducts a deforestation assessment every three years in which the annual deforestation data is the average of the three-year changes. Deforestation maps are then released by the ministry based on the interpretation of medium spatial resolution (30-m pixel) Landsat 5 and 7 imagery. 

The deforestation maps are also published online and updated from time to time on webgis.dephut.go.id. When this article was being written, however, the website was inaccessible. But we previously accessed this website on numerous occasions. 

The Forestry Ministry can also release raw data on land cover changes upon request. This shows that the government has taken some very important steps to achieve greater transparency. Therefore, one should not dismiss these positive efforts initiated by the ministry. 

Regarding the difference between the rate of deforestation presented by Hansen et al. (2013) and the official data from the Forestry Ministry, it occurred mainly because the two studies adopted different definitions of forest and forest change. 

A quick visual comparison between the maps produced by the Forestry Ministry and Hansen et al. (2003) show a significant underestimation of forest cover extent in the Forestry Ministry’s map. 

Many forest covers included in the map of Hansen et al. (2013) are not captured as forests in the Forestry Ministry’s map. 
Additionally, most areas where forest change (both gain and loss) occur are in areas classified as non-forests, therefore, they are not under the authority of the Forestry Ministry. 

Non-forest areas, known as areas for other use (APL) are currently under the authority of local governments and the Land Agency. 

These are some preliminary observations that can be enhanced when Hansen et al. develop their raw data available for further detailed spatial analysis. 

Certainly, the accuracy and robustness of the methodology adopted by the Forestry Ministry can be improved. It could provide an enormous service to Indonesia by making its deforestation monitoring annual, by providing data for all forest areas and making digital deforestation maps available online in a timely manner. 

We disagree with suggestion that Indonesia should rely on Google for its forest monitoring (the Hansen et al. data is available through Google Maps). 
Indonesia should not depend on a private sector tool to map its forest resources and customary land rights. These tasks are too important to be “outsourced” to a company. 

Instead, the Forestry Ministry should improve its forest monitoring as we have recommended. 
We should, however, recognize the important role of independent assessments to quality-check Indonesia’s official data. Robust and transparent official deforestation data is a powerful tool for good forest management. 

In Brazil, where deforestation in the Amazon region has declined 70 percent, deforestation data is made available to the public every year, a strong example of good governance of vast forest frontiers. 

Indonesia is on track to robust and transparent deforestation monitoring. Let’s hope that it continues to progress toward the goal of reduced deforestation.

The writers work for the Earth Innovation Institute.

Monday, January 13, 2014

Conversation between Apple and Samsung Lovers

While I was having my breakfast at once morning,  I was reading a ebook with my mini iPad when suddenly my housemate a Ghanaian girl shown up..What,'s that she asked..before I gave my answer she came with her another question...is that mini IPad? Yes, it is..I answered. Then she continued talking...Oh no..you know what? I start don't like Apple devices..I've just ordered my Samsung mini tab few days ago and can't patiently receive that, and like it very much she added. Why you don't like apple devices? I replied.. You know there are at least two reasons she replied..first, to me iPhone, iPad, iPod are the same...for example between iPhone 4, 5 and now iPhone 6 are remain the same in term of their functionalities just for telephoning, texting, emailing, picturing...nothing else she stressed. This is totally different from Samsung devices such as mobile phone and mini tab ..you can do everything from cropping, copying, texting, picturing and etc...she added...secondly, if you want to use new apps in the Apple devices you have to buy nothing is free she explained...

I think your opinion is not totally true I replied to her...you can do many things with your iPhone, iPad, iPhone, MacBook and iMac..I convinced her...with iPad you can do telephoning, texting, picturing, reading, writing, drawing...etc..while talking I shown her how I opening my ebook pages by flipping one page to another page easily...and while I was playing with my iBook apps, she curiously asking...how can you do that flipping with your iPad just like flipping a real book???...she added... That one reason I really like iPad I replied to her...I can't do a reading like this with my samsung mobile I added...but! we have to buy these books right? She said while positing to the list of tens books at my iBook library....Not at all, I replied..there are many free books at the Apple store, you can download everything you want range from novel, fiction and science books I convinced her...similarly with Apple Apps ..I continued..apart from some non-free apps, there are many free apps too where you can download easily without paying single penny...just click, open and run I assured here...
Apart from shown her how to read an ebook with my Mini iPad I also shown here how to organise easily thoughts and ideas with my MindNode apps in my Mini iPad.....oh that's really gorgeous way of summarising things..I really like that and I do need that kinds of apps for the next semester she excitedly said to me...

By the way, can you help me how to find free ebooks and download one of these to my iPhone she asked....ok let me show you how to do that, I replied and then I typed free books with her iPhone search engine and run it..hundred of free books appeared and I downloaded one of those...and I opened the ebook with her iBook app..and hand over her iPhone to her to play with this ebook by herself...Wow..look I really like this ...this is awesome she was laughing and so exciting...I will download as many as free books later on to my iPhone she added..

Anyway, ..I am having and using both Apple and Samsung devices I continued...to my understanding both Apple and Samsung devices have their own advantages and drawbacks..that all depend on us how to maximise the advantages and minimise the limitations so as to help us in our daily activities..I love both Apple and Samsung devices I finished the conversation...

This article does not intended to judge and exploit a certain company's technology limitations and also there is no intention to promote a company product either..I just want to draw a lesson learnt to us that sophisticated technology is meant nothing if we can't use them in proper and efficient ways.







Short Interview with a Tourist from Australia on Pulau Padar NTT

On 7th July 2022 I visited Pulau Padar (Padar Island), one of the Islands in the Komodo National Park in Nusa Tenggara Timur Province. Pulau...